Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:08

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump, DOJ threaten Calif. with legal action, fines after trans athlete’s win - The Washington Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Mario Kart World Coins Don't Function As You'd Expect, New Evidence Suggests - GameSpot
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Chevy’s C8 Corvette ZR1 Supercar Is Even Faster Than It Expected - Robb Report
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
UK-US tariff deal begins but still no news on steel - BBC
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Why does Taylor Swift endorse Harris when Harris supports open borders?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Eli Lilly drug preserves lean mass in patients losing weight on Wegovy - STAT